<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>NetbookTech - Latest Comments in The Picobook Pro fails to impress ZDNet UK</title><link>http://netbooktech.disqus.com/</link><description>Your source for netbook news and info</description><atom:link href="https://netbooktech.disqus.com/the_picobook_pro_fails_to_impress_zdnet_uk/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:51:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Picobook Pro fails to impress ZDNet UK</title><link>http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/10/17/the-picobook-pro-fails-to-impress-zdnet-uk/#comment-32516875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Meyer did a little snooping around and discovered that the Picobook Pro is in fact a rebadged FIC CE241 netbook pictured below. Nice.. yeah I think I’m staying away from this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mens Wedding Bands</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:51:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>